https://www.tariffintegrity.org/home daily 1.0 2025-02-11 https://www.tariffintegrity.org/sunsong daily 0.75 2025-02-11 https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/64415ad9962f1746a5444ba3/2012400b-c9e4-442f-a2dc-013be0c8a51f/ChinaStamp_V4.png Case Study 1: Sunsong - Make it stand out According to U.S law, the products shipped from Thailand to the U.S must have undergone a “fundamental change” after arriving from China (Ex: sugar from country A and flour from country B combined to make a new product is such a fundamental change) in order to be considered truthfully “made in Thailand.” Since evidence suggests no such change has occurred to Sunsong’s products, Sunsong claiming its’ products are manufactured in Thailand is a violation of the aforementioned law and, by extension, constitutes a failure to pay the Section 301 import tariffs currently imposed on Chinese goods. https://www.tariffintegrity.org/tti/milwaukeetool daily 0.75 2025-05-15 https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/64415ad9962f1746a5444ba3/f057a748-8f6b-41b1-a64d-3d11d8a12b73/TAPP_GovSubsidies_Infographic_V2.jpg Case Study 2: TTI/Milwaukee Tool - Additionally, Milwaukee/TTI’s Vietnam-US import volume was nearly double (1.8 times) that of its China-US volume, even though the company has the same number of factories in each country and its largest manufacturing hub is in mainland China.⁶